Shows closed-loop referral performance in one operating view: source, handoff, partner response, outcome, and attributable commercial impact.
| Partner | Score | Referrals | Engagement | Revenue | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SA
Smith & Associates
Criminal Defence
|
★★★★★ 4.8 |
1,750 | 84% | $420K | +18% |
|
WM
Watts McCray
Family Law
|
★★★★★ 4.5 |
1,300 | 79% | $320K | +14% |
|
FR
Fragomen
Immigration
|
★★★★★ 4.3 |
880 | 76% | $220K | +27% |
|
SN
Stary Norton Halphen
Criminal Defence
|
★★★★★ 4.1 |
620 | 74% | $160K | +9% |
The challenge is not just making referrals — it's knowing what happened after handoff. Did the client engage? Were they satisfied? What was the outcome? The infrastructure below enables this across a network of legal service providers.
referralId and posts a structured handoff payload to the vetted partner via webhook: matter type, jurisdiction, urgency score, and client consent token. The handoff is timestamped and logged against the originating conversation.client.engaged → matter.opened → matter.closed, each with a structured payload (outcome type, date, optional settlement value). Partners without API capability can use an email-triggered link or a simple partner portal form.referralId to attribute the response. This keeps the NPS signal independent of the partner relationship and attributable back to the referral source, pathway, and originating intake channel.